Photoshop goes far beyond "photography" as typical people at DPReview see it, and will continue to be developed for leading-edge professional tasks. I think Adobe would argue that people who object to the subscription model are not really their target market for Photoshop. I subscribe to the full CC, yet I'm retired. There is a large market they can sell to at the right price. Why is the "Photography" CC plan a cheap anomaly? I think it is because, unlike most other Adobe apps, Photoshop is widely used by amateurs and photography-only professionals. Yet it provides (in my opinion) far more capability, representing far more development effort over the years.Ī recent report said that most recent Adobe revenues came from recurring payments including the Creative Cloud. It provides Lightroom + Photoshop for half the price of a CC plan for just (say) Dreamweaver. The "Photography" CC plan is a bit of an anomaly. Most of those apps are mainly intended for professionals anyway. Full CC subscription gives access to nearly all of Adobe's major apps, of which Photoshop is just one of many.
Adobe is heavily developing the Creative Cloud for leading-edge creative professionals.
0 kommentar(er)
